User:Csalcedo97/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) - Public health nursing
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. As someone that is about to go into the field of health administration & pubic health I have a strong interest in health professionals.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? There are no major sections, so no.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Overly detailed because there are no major sections to put information on.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, just very brief.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I believe that there could be a lot added to this article.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes, it gives information to the reader using fact and no opinions.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I believe that there could be more information.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No, because I believe there could be more information given.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, the oldest source is from 2012.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Since there is only 1 paragraph I think that when adding more information there will be a need to reformat.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Only 1 paragraph, so no.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No,
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Only 1 person has commented so far on the 'talk' section.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is a part of the WikiProject Medicine and WikiProject Health and Fitness. It is of low importance for both.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Needs work.
 * What are the article's strengths? It will be easy to organize since there is not much there to start out with.
 * How can the article be improved? Adding information, pictures, etc.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Under-developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: Talk:Public health nursing