User:Csanherz/sandbox

Article Evaluation

I learned how to actually edit an article, a sandbox, and the talk pages. It's starting to get more difficult but with practice, it'll hopefully become easier. I learned how to use wikicode, which sounds hard, but it is not too difficult. I also learned how to look for good articles and how to spot bad ones. The training also broke down how to actually get started in editing an article, which was helpful because it was confusing thinking about how to start. It also explained how one should always leave an edit summary after each edit. The training also showed how to add citations, using the cite button, which makes it easy and quick to add your sources. However, you have to be careful that your sources are reliable and neutral. For example, the article on psychology is an example of a good article- its facts are backed by reliable sources, everything in the article is relevant, and it appears to be neutral. The links in the reference section seem to work fine and the information looks to be well cited and paraphrased- no plagiarism. Some sections could maybe use a little more information, but overall, this article is a good and reliable article.

Nice work on your evaluation and placing things in your sandbox! So, what would you do to improve the article on Psychology? Are there any sections you would add? Edits you would make? Liz