User:Cturgiss/Media regulation/Jackkk42 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cturgiss


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Talk:Mass media regulation
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mass media regulation

Evaluate the drafted changes
I noticed lots of great edits towards the page. Cturgiss was correct in stating that the link under reference two isn't working. They also suggested a new article to add in its place. Anything that was asked to be changed or edited had some sort of issue. There was out of date info they suggested changing, which I noticed when I looked back as well. Diversifying the countries listed in the article was also brought up, since there are no countries from South or Central America included. They even linked some articles about the topic in Brazil to use. The bias in the China section that they mentioned comes from, "At the early period of the modern history of China, the relationship between government and society was extremely unbalanced. Government held power over the Chinese people and controlled the media, making the media highly political." This section feels opinionated, since using "extremely unbalanced" to describe a relationship shifts toward somebody's opinion on the matter. Overall, lots of great info was given, and whenever a link for new content was needed, it was included.