User:Cullen328/Sandbox/Benador

Comment Szzuk expressed the opinion that Jim Lobe's article in Asia Times Online was somehow "self published". There isn't a shred of evidence for that. If the editor meant "self promotion" then that is also incorrect. Jim Lobe is a well-known and long time critic of the neo-conservative movement that Benador served so enthusiastically, and Lobe is the last person that Benador would go to to promote or "publish" herself. Lobe's article and the article in The Nation both make the explicit point that Benador is of long-term historic significance. That's exactly why we should keep this article. Anarchangel and Libstar failed to notice that her first name can be spelled two ways, and searched under the least common spelling. For those who want more in-depth coverage that what is already in the article, here's an article from The Guardian.