User:Cullen328/sandbox/Hijiri

Hello Hijiri88,

I do not like to edit archives, so I will reply to your various archived comments to me here.


 * You're lucky never to have tried to improve our articles on the films (and TV series) in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Civil editors work on highly controversial articles every day without disruption and without constant conflict with others. There is nothing about the Marvel topic area that explains or justifies disruptive behavior. It is not exactly the Syrian civil war. Your piped wikilink link of "oxymoron" is not funny, not clever, and rather is evidence of a flip, dismissive attitude when your behavior is being discussed.


 * Yeah, maybe I could avoid these situations by simply walking away and editing other articles as soon as anyone makes an unpleasant remark, but that's the kind of thing that leads to really bad articles being publicly touted as Good Articles, which is the opposite of the stated goal of this project:

You are far from the only editor who tries to maintain quality standards in the area of GA review. Your wish to describe articles undergoing peer review as "really bad articles" is disrespectful to your fellow editors and evidence of a disruptive battleground mentality. If you want to continue editing, your only choice is to "walk away" from these petty, obsessive disputes.


 * We're supposed to build an encyclopedia while avoiding conflict, not avoiding conflict at the expense of the encyclopedia.

Speak in the first person singular when your behavior is being discussed, please. Your pet conflicts far too often disrupt this encyclopedia. Your failure to manage conflict is a serious problem, and you need to deal with it.


 * Why am I being asked to waste time defending myself here?

I have asked nothing of you other than to abandon all disruptive behavior. You could choose silence and an internal commitment to better behavior. Instead you chose to continue the conversation


 * ''If you are not going to look at the article itself to figure out whether my concerns are valid, what's the point of criticizing me based purely on my rhetoric in expressing those concerns?'

I have no interest whatsoever in that article's content. Adminstrators do not adjudicate content disputes. I am here, as an administrator, only to discuss your disruptive behavior and encourage you to abandon that behavior. Please do so.