User:Cullen328/sandbox/Mike

Hello, Mikednjusa. It looks to me that the topic of your draft article is a neologism coined by Craig Childress. The only references that discuss the specific concept are three sources written by Childress himself. The first thing that you need to understand is that an acceptable Wikipedia article summarizes what reliable sources which are independent of the topic say about it. Therefore, the sources written by Childress himself are worthless for establishing the notability of the topic, and are of very limited use in writing such an article. Your other sources are other Wikipedia articles (which are never allowed as reliable sources), or diagnostic listings which do not mention the topic at hand. So far, you have not established that the topic is notable.

As for the neutral point of view, it is a style of writing which simply summarizes the topic without any hint of advocacy or criticism in Wikipedia's voice. At its most basic, it is a very dry and factual way of writing. It describes what the full range of published sources say about the topic, without taking sides in any controversy.

Your section "Top 15 Things to Know About Attachment-Based Parental Alienation" is completely inappropriate for a neutral encyclopedia article. That's the kind of clickbait headline far too often used by advertising driven websites, and is completely contrary to the Wikipedia style. We never lecture readers about what they should know. We present information neutrally and let the readers decide what they want to know on their own.