User:Cullen328/sandbox/NZLSA

According to Notability (organizations and companies), "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." Emphasis added. Currently in, there are zero such sources in this article. So, I did a search for such sources. I learned that the group was harshly criticized for a 2011 ad widely perceived as sexist. More than one source covered this controversy. I learned that the group was peripherally involved in a controversy about a law firm accused of failing to deal with sexual harassment. I saw coverage in a local newspaper of local law students performing well in a competition sponsored by this group. I saw hint of coverage in a law journal back in the 1970s. But what I haven't seen so far is significant coverage in independent sources. I readily concede that I may have missed some good sources in my search. The burden is on editors who want to keep this article to furnish the kind of sources that establish notability according to Wikipedia's standards. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)