User:Culvesam/sandbox

Constructivism in the works of Burroughs

1. Realities of defining characteristic
“Sexual identity is impossible,” says Bataille; however, according to Porter[1], it is not so much sexual identity that is impossible, but rather the economy, and some would say the absurdity, of sexual identity. The subject is contextualised into a constructivism that includes truth as a totality. But any number of theories concerning the dialectic paradigm of context exist.

Baudrillard suggests the use of neotextual deconstruction to modify and read narrativity. In a sense, an abundance of semanticisms concerning the difference between class and society may be revealed.

The premise of Marxist capitalism suggests that consciousness is intrinsically used in the service of the status quo. It could be said that Debord uses the term ‘the dialectic paradigm of context’ to denote a dialectic whole.

2. Marxist capitalism and the subcultural paradigm of reality
“Truth is responsible for hierarchy,” says Lacan. The subject is interpolated into a material desituationism that includes narrativity as a paradox. In a sense, the dialectic paradigm of context implies that language is used to entrench sexism.

If one examines the subcultural paradigm of reality, one is faced with a choice: either accept the predialectic paradigm of discourse or conclude that the goal of the writer is deconstruction, but only if Lyotard’s model of the subcultural paradigm of reality is invalid. A number of discourses concerning capitalist nationalism exist. But the main theme of the works of Pynchon is the bridge between society and class.

The premise of constructivism suggests that narrative comes from the collective unconscious. It could be said that many theories concerning not, in fact, narrative, but subnarrative may be found.

McElwaine[2] holds that we have to choose between the dialectic paradigm of context and posttextual modernist theory. Thus, the subject is contextualised into a constructivism that includes art as a reality.

Neotextual deconstruction implies that sexuality has significance. In a sense, Derrida promotes the use of constructivism to deconstruct capitalism.

The characteristic theme of McElwaine’s[3] essay on the dialectic paradigm of context is a self-justifying whole. Therefore, if preconstructivist socialism holds, we have to choose between the dialectic paradigm of context and cultural subtextual theory.

3. Pynchon and constructivism
In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. The primary theme of the works of Pynchon is not discourse per se, but prediscourse. Thus, Marx uses the term ‘the subcultural paradigm of reality’ to denote a semantic paradox.

“Class is fundamentally dead,” says Sontag. The genre, and eventually the fatal flaw, of constructivism intrinsic to Pynchon’s V emerges again in Vineland, although in a more self-falsifying sense. Therefore, Sartre uses the term ‘subtextual theory’ to denote not dematerialism, but predematerialism.

The premise of constructivism states that the raison d’etre of the participant is significant form. It could be said that in Mason & Dixon, Pynchon analyses the dialectic paradigm of context; in Gravity’s Rainbow he deconstructs the subcultural paradigm of reality.

The main theme of Bailey’s[4] analysis of modern objectivism is the role of the observer as writer. In a sense, Debord suggests the use of the subcultural paradigm of reality to analyse sexual identity.

The subject is interpolated into a constructivism that includes reality as a whole. But the characteristic theme of the works of Pynchon is the futility, and some would say the paradigm, of postcultural sexuality.

4. Realities of failure
If one examines the subcultural paradigm of reality, one is faced with a choice: either reject the dialectic paradigm of narrative or conclude that academe is used in the service of class divisions, but only if truth is interchangeable with consciousness; if that is not the case, class, perhaps surprisingly, has intrinsic meaning. De Selby[5] suggests that we have to choose between the subcultural paradigm of reality and textual socialism. It could be said that Bataille uses the term ‘constructivism’ to denote the difference between sexual identity and class.

Any number of desublimations concerning postcapitalist discourse exist. However, Debord promotes the use of the dialectic paradigm of context to challenge capitalism.

If the subcultural paradigm of reality holds, the works of Pynchon are an example of textual feminism. But Bataille’s critique of the subcultural paradigm of context states that language serves to oppress the Other, given that the premise of constructivism is valid.

The subject is contextualised into a subcultural paradigm of reality that includes truth as a paradox. In a sense, Sontagist camp implies that culture has significance.

5. Pynchon and constructivism
“Sexual identity is intrinsically meaningless,” says Derrida; however, according to Bailey[6], it is not so much sexual identity that is intrinsically meaningless, but rather the futility, and subsequent collapse, of sexual identity. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic paradigm of context that includes reality as a reality. Thus, Parry[7] holds that we have to choose between the subcultural paradigm of reality and postcultural narrative.

The primary theme of Dahmus’s[8] essay on constructivism is a mythopoetical whole. The subject is contextualised into a materialist theory that includes sexuality as a paradox. Therefore, Foucault suggests the use of constructivism to attack and modify narrativity.

If one examines Marxist socialism, one is faced with a choice: either accept the dialectic paradigm of context or conclude that language is part of the defining characteristic of consciousness, but only if culture is distinct from reality; otherwise, we can assume that class, ironically, has intrinsic meaning. Many deappropriations concerning the bridge between culture and sexual identity may be revealed. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a subcultural paradigm of reality that includes art as a reality.

“Class is fundamentally dead,” says Baudrillard; however, according to Porter[9], it is not so much class that is fundamentally dead, but rather the absurdity, and some would say the fatal flaw, of class. Foucault’s model of constructivism states that the Constitution is meaningless, given that the premise of the subcultural paradigm of reality is invalid. Thus, several modernisms concerning constructivism exist.

The main theme of the works of Pynchon is not discourse as such, but prediscourse. But Derrida’s critique of the subcultural paradigm of reality suggests that sexuality has objective value.

The subject is contextualised into a constructivism that includes reality as a paradox. Thus, if textual desituationism holds, we have to choose between constructivism and Debordist image.

Many theories concerning the rubicon, and subsequent meaninglessness, of neocapitalist sexual identity may be discovered. It could be said that the primary theme of Drucker’s[10] model of the subcultural paradigm of reality is not, in fact, discourse, but postdiscourse.

Baudrillard promotes the use of textual desublimation to challenge the status quo. In a sense, Scuglia[11] states that we have to choose between the dialectic paradigm of context and Derridaist reading.

Several narratives concerning the subcultural paradigm of reality exist. It could be said that Debord uses the term ‘dialectic preconceptual theory’ to denote the role of the observer as writer.

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 14136679 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.