User:Cunning8/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Gauss's law for magnetism)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article as its a topic that I am familiar with and wanted to see what else I could learn about it. Gauss's law for magnetism is one of Maxwell's 4 equations which are important to learn about when it comes to electrodynamics. My first impression was the article is very well written and gives a lot of information in a clean concise manner.

Evaluate the article
Overall this is a well written article on Gauss's law for magnetism. A few areas I feel should be commented on:

Lead Section:

The final paragraph of the lead section discusses the name of the law and other names for it. This is not expanded upon anywhere else in the article and part of this paragraph could fit in the "History" section of the content. It could also be given its own section but I don't know if the information is relevant enough for a whole section dedicated to it.

Content, Tone, Images and Writing Quality:

All of this is well done in the article, everything feels relevant, neutral and is written in a very concise manner. The information is all straight to the point and gives everything needed.

Sources and References:

This article contains plenty of diverse sources that are up to date and thorough, pulling from multiple textbooks, peer reviewed articles and papers. The section on "History" does not have any in text citations only links to other Wikipedia articles so that area could perhaps use more sources to verify its claims.

Overall, the article is well done and does an excellent job at presenting information. It was an easy read and needs very little improvement. The talk page shows the article is C-class which I feel is on the low end but I also feel that B class isn't fully fitting either. I believe most of the improvements could come from citations and maybe providing more information on the sections rather than linking to more Wikipedia articles.