User:Cunningseafarer12/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck:
 * Article Evaluation:Overall, I think this is a good article that is neutral, relevant, and concise but it could be developed further with the use of more scholarly sources. I think the article was written neutrally and does not over emphasize one point of view. While everything seems to be cited, there is the overuse of one source and overall not many sources used. Most of the article's information is coming from source number three. While source number three is a scholarly source, I think it would be important to find another source to back up the claims. The citations look reliable. The article does not tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. There has been a bit of activity on the article's Talk Page. While I think this article is in need of some updating, I can not find many sources to use from HC libraries. :
 * Sources
 * https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10347-019-0553-8?pdf=openurl
 * https://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?sid=EBSCO%3aedsgao&genre=article&issn=15389111&ISBN=&volume=&issue=&date=20190405&spage=453&pages=&title=Science+Letter&atitle=Findings+from+University+of+Tuscia+Provides+New+Data+on+Facies+Research+(Study+of+the+Bioerosion+of+Phoenician+Elephant+Tusks+From+the+Shipwreck+of+Bajo+De+La+Campana%3a+Lots+of+Hypotheses%2c+Few+Certainties)&aulast=&id=DOI%3a&site=ftf-live

Option 2

 * Gozo Phoenician shipwreck:
 * Article Evaluation:Overall, I think this is a good article that is neutral, relevant, concise, and is backed up by many scholarly articles. I think this article is written neutrally and does not over emphasize one point of view because of its use of many different scholarly sources. It appears that all claims have a citation and many claims have multiple citations. Most of the citation are from scholarly journals which are a reliable source. The article does not tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. There is some action on the article's talk page, specifically about finding photos of the ship. I have listed some sources below but overall there are many more that I could use on the HC libraries site.
 * Sources
 * [https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/311230/1-s2.0-S2352409X18X0008X/1-s2.0-S2352409X18306965/main.pdf?X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEJf%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJIMEYCIQCbFG7hULkQgTROtcxmiRDc1vuY0VJcIu9vUa8HIbadDgIhAMshqQ011q%2FfBCoZoeFbp%2B0sY05G6NrSxj2Vud%2BhtmQFKrwFCMD%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEQBRoMMDU5MDAzNTQ2ODY1IgzQidErQpO4u88qqGcqkAXe10vszqZqriwiDKYKxV1ciOGbtTZqKYglL8mjZYOmL5AluY8JEpy1ulRunlSBoiG2sI9GsEiXUtsScghAOf%2BGNJJcKiVlMr%2BDQFKYXM2mPrqOAHNe%2Bl3Rmxi5qD7dhyt7CrvpRoxOxiVD0pApRim72GJRY%2Fyzzd7G8nXTMdLa8zECvcMYOvePMNSSlYdXQaWJvFlHxaHf9DMy88Pc6WFnMKw%2B73st7aAV67g9G1WxtiFI%2BlsmSS9KRB0xh9L4DoCiHGmTvdKkcCpA%2FtMAcNUIdxduRi4kTuZzRrz4Y1UI5GZkmvFbImgyBA0M2ZIeira%2FtGB%2Bjb1IuNmSO1jFrIG%2FJ%2FY13nv7qAWnXZjMy%2B7%2BVSPJVGCRTHVzMut1y%2FksmczK1FKcVEq51Okide%2Fo7hq7Ujmc9yT9SupJSs20RKNfiTzZvHvcc7fUiIz5VtJkFvSX7t2zbUV%2FqiTDs9sopmeT8ORpuZ9%2BH8OkjBlQL7ThZRSw1ndNu4UrzTPKCGa4LBJD6wapG5GAPwaiVwvS02zZMta5ZjhhAUzo43ePSnGmz2wN3vlYMS3HfKStxWXJsRyJwKtcSqhGgN1%2F0QLdkKKj87IzDXY0M%2FqV3TKeoghe37F0AGMVBke0ta9nBa0WBRjCgApGfE1NMqdb4H7IRkf6x1Gq8iwWyUm6YDFBAZN2ZL157F%2FCq7MywdVUX%2Bj7LxeDScWZxYRYNxICB0NXQHowED7hiERj77jsT%2FE%2FEVeB9UCaTW6R3xnjoWEhBd7duVABR9qNBKN8tWfttQWol1D7iyJWB9zedjMLIVM1zV0pJwdCak8OTtzpq%2BicXSpB2qXNHiE6EWrOdv62CNufsXOLsBy6h1RIRhUy3eDRR4URpzDcucWwBjqwASEFDmP3y3l8Q2XqhXvICtqDSZNuFpH7ss52dF7UilBHCytRk70wCdgF%2F9m%2Fye6WdUalzTgZRTYDI2kbcbkHygh5qT3LrownnHS2lXpnN%2FravvjU1OiNQsK9pcaK2shNoCX7k4OKep8IzWHZgwRjSRfPg26ozc16RikCJ9vbqIvX9JcGZZqOlh%2BmRnNhmFvJag5pY2bVjS4iQ0B%2FPd8Aemi%2BLnydDq7lUhdDS4kcIyKT&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20240406T161301Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAQ3PHCVTYVCWBCWQC%2F20240406%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=bbbf43be3751781c9c68d662e98fbdfd478e1d9785d22be9c3a63fc281d75b25&hash=041a728fed046790c1a8a88a4293e858ff2bb4d0c2cf9a35145a8f6ceedfcc33&host=68042c943591013ac2b2430a89b270f6af2c76d8dfd086a07176afe7c76c2c61&pii=S2352409X18306965&tid=spdf-d6bead95-8b9e-4d17-912d-2cdd804099dd&sid=41df9b5a67e2c449281ae3a46912ff972958gxrqa&type=client&ua=0f105b56565c5f545557&rr=87031015bf114cc0&cc=us]
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10572414.2021.1943403

Option 3

 * Bireme:Overall, this article has many gaps and needs to be updated. There are whole paragraphs with no citations leading me to question the neutrality and accuracy of this article. However, the reference that are used are from scholarly sources. Thus, I think this article urgently needs to be updated with citations. The article does not tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. There is some action on the talk page inquiring about a merge of this article with another and a few questions about the article. I have listed a few sources below that I think would have important information to add to this article. :
 * Sources
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00253359.1973.10657925
 * "Phoenician ships : types, trends, trade and treacherous trade routes" by Anne Marie Smith :