User:Curiouscat21/Ayo Akingbade/Lakeley Peer Review

Lead: The lead is short and concise providing enough information to have an understanding of the individual, it also provides a small piece of the articles major section. It does provide a small introduction but there is room to add if necessary.

Content: The content throughout the article is relevant to the topic, the information presented seems to be up to date. Although there dosen't seem to be a lot of information potentially due to the fact there is none at hand to use.

Tone and Balance: The text is in an informative tone therefore it is neutral throughout it, There isn't necessarily content missing there just is a lack of information. The information given dosen't persuade the reader in any way in my opinion. Overall the tone of the text is very well done and kept neutral.

Organization: The text is very well organized in the categories that Wikipedia has provided as guide lines. The content is well written but again there is room to add if the author would like or if it is necessary. The grammar for the most part has been corrected with minor errors.

Overall Impressions: Overall the article meets all the basic requirements minus the word count, I would add some information to the Bibliography if possible helping the readers gain a little extra information from the individual. The tone is very well done and the organization as well. Overall I enjoyed the read and learning about Akingbade.

General info
(Curiouscat21)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Curiouscat21/Ayo_Akingbade?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)