User:Curti485/Max Caulfield/Levi.roske Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Curti485


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Curti485/Max Caulfield - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Life Is Strange (video game) - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
I want to start by saying that your information looks really good, and just needs to be expanded. I also want to mention that I am not sure if you plan on keeping the existing article or parts of it, but make sure you are not repeating information if you are keeping it.

Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? There is no lead in your section, make sure to add one if you are not planning to keep the one that is in the existing page. If you are keeping the existing one, I would add a little about the idea behind a female protagonist

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, it all ties in with the video game and the protagonist
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I do not think so, but before you add your draft to the real page make sure to filter what is already written so you do not have repeat information
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes and no, is does not really relate to the wiki equity gap, but it does have information about the issues of making the protagonist female

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? Overall, it seems very neutral
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, however, when explaining her appearances, I feel like you need to add more sources, it feels like there is just the whole section that has no sources or backup information (Life is Strange section under the video game header)
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? /Is at least one of them a source from class reading or the "suggested sources" list? If not, can you think of anything we've read that might be useful for them? I do not see any sources from class, but I am not sure if there are any that tie in or not. You could go in to talking about those articles that we read about lesbian bars and needing to hide sexuality, but i do not know if that is nessessary
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? It seems like it
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) Definitely check into the already written sources and see if there are any important ones to add. The existing page has a ton of sources and I am sure that they either overlap yours or could be very helpful in expanding your article

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, just make sure nothing is being repeated with the already existing page
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I notice
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, just I would add more or note where in the original article these topics are going

Images and Media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, but I would add a few more images. Right now there is only the one
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, it says that the photo you have added is your own work, which I do not know if it is or not, but just make sure that if it isn't that you fix the citing
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, like I mentioned I would add a few more

Overall impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?/How can the content added be improved? I feel like the information you added did improve the article, however I feel like you should try to focus more on the gender and sexuality of the character.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? I feel like these are very strong additions, when playing a video game nobody really thinks twice about inequality or underrepresented groups, and I think it was amazing that you added that

Additional Questions


 * Does your peer have 5-7 reliable sources? Your source list is just under the required amount (need 15) so I would focus on finding a few more sources
 * Does the topic link in some way to our course material? Yes, the information about women protagonists and her sexuality ties really nicely, I would even try to add more in that area
 * Does your peer add historical context to their article? Not really, so maybe add more about the history of having female protagonists
 * Based on what you know from course content, what do you think Wikipedia users should know about this topic? In other words, what would you recommend adding and/or considering further? You need to look at the existing page and figure out what is going to be deleted and what you are going to keep. Right now, the existing page is more explaining than informative, so make sure your additions correlate