User:Curti485/Max Caulfield/Smi02002 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Curti485, Boodoll526, Kizzardly, Donvonvononavan, and Shadycedars


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Curti485/Max_Caulfield?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Life Is Strange (video game) This is the redirected link, so technically the article does not exist

Lead
The lead is brief and concise, introducing the character that the article is about and what games they appear in. Considering this article is about this character, the lead is a good introduction to what the reader will be reading about. The lead does contain information that is not included in the article.

Content
The content of the article is related to the topic, explaining her character development of how the character was created, as well as her different appearances in the game series. The content all is up to date according to the sources and appears to be accurate to the games. This article does go towards eliminating wikipedia's equity gaps as the article didn't exist before even though Max Caulfield is the main character of the video game.

Tone and Balance
The content is neutral and informational without any heave bias towards one side or another. It feels like there is an overrepresentation of the description of the first game and not the others, but further reading shows that there isn't more to be written about. However I do think that if there could be, a section on Max's character as a whole would be a good addition.

Sources and References
The sources are all recent and are decent sources of information. The sources reflect what was written in the article and provide good information that was brought into the article.

Organization
The article is well organized and there don't appear to be any major grammar issues in relation to misspelled words etc. However some sentences are difficult to understand and are a bit wordy. Otherwise the article is easy to read and understand overall.

Images and Media
The image and media box is good. The image is easy to see and clear with basic information underneath that adds extra information in relation to the character such as voice actors and in-universe information like any other character article on wikipedia.

For New Articles
The article has good and reliable sources that add information to the article. The list of sources is good, not too short and not super long either. The pattern and organization of the article is clear and easy to follow with several links to other wikipedia articles to allow it to be more discoverable.

Overall Impression
The article is well written and covers the information well. The only thing that I would work on is making the sentences less wordy and a bit easier to read. Otherwise I think the article is good.