User:Curtnyp/Achatinella livida/Itsjosiah.g Peer Review

General info
Curtnyp
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Curtnyp/Achatinella livida
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Achatinella livida

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) * I like the formatting of the text. Everything is short but detailed.  It's easy to keep track of the information.
 * 4) Check the main points of the article:
 * 5) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 6) * This article only talks about the species itself.
 * 7) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 8) * Yes
 * 9) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 10) * The information in each section is appropriate.
 * 11) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 12) * The writing is grammatically correct and the format is good as well.
 * 13) Check the sources:
 * 14) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 15) * Yes
 * 16) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 17) * Yes
 * 18) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 19) * Yes
 * 20) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 21) * Good sources, relates to the topic.
 * 22) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 23) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 24) * Add visuals so the reader knows what they're reading about.
 * 25) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 26) * No, not yet, more information could be added and more elements could be added as well.
 * 27) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 28) * They could add more info about their subject
 * 29) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?
 * 30) * No

Response to peer review:

Hi, Josiah! I wanted to thank you for taking the time to give me feedback on my article. I completely agree with your suggestion to add more visuals to the article to help readers understand what the A. livida looks like. I'll also work on adding additional information and elements throughout the piece to make it more informative. Thank you for your help, and I wish you the best with your draft.