User:Cvonne12/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Carol L. Krumhansl
 * It is about a female psychologist whose main focus is music, in which that I love music. Also there is a lot to work on.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * The introduction that states who she is, what she does, and her contributions to psychology.
 * The introduction also includes major portions in sections.
 * The article is so small that it only has a little bit of information in it. But the information in the lead is there in external links.
 * The lead is very concise and to the point.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * The article's content is relevant to the topic because it talks about the important things she has done.
 * The content is not up to date the most recent reference is from 2016.
 * The missing content is her early life and her date of birth and if dead her death date.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * The article is completely neutral, and all facts.
 * There aren't any claims that appear biased in a position.
 * There are a lot of facts about her life that are underrepresented.
 * The article doesn't attempt to persuade anybody's opinion.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * The facts in the article are backed up by secondary sources that aren't really reliable because they are more website articles that are from critically acclaimed websites but not from peer reviewed articles.
 * They reflect the accurate information that is on the Wikipedia page.
 * The sources are not current. The latest is from 2016.
 * Most of the links work other than one that leads to something that isn't the accurate article.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * The article is very well written. It is clear and concise and easy to read.
 * The article doesn't have grammatical or spelling errors.
 * The article is well organized even if it's missing some information it's greatly stated out facts.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * There are no images that enhance the understanding of the topic.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * There are no conversations on the talk page.
 * The article is not rated and it is in the Women Psychologists Wiki Projects.
 * Wikipedia talks about the topic in a biographical way.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * The status of the article was it's a stub.
 * The article's strengths are it is factual and straight to the point.
 * The article can be improved by having more facts and more information about it. And better sources.
 * The article isn't complete at all. It's poorly developed and doesn't have enough information.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: