User:Cvtang/Evaluate an Article

= Evaluate an article =

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Archaea
 * I chose this article because I am interested in learning more about archaea.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * I would say it jumps in straight to the topic and not necessarily summarizes what we will read about.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * not really
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * I don't think there is a lead
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * again no lead

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * no

Content evaluation
good

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Tone and balance evaluation
good

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * for the most part yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * yeah
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Sources and references evaluation
good

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * yeah
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * not sure
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * conversations about edits-- reasoning why they should be included- and information // what edits have been done etc
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * FA- top importance - Microbiology
 * highly-- it is featured and considered a vital article
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * no difference?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * I think it is pretty complete and well documented
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * short intro to archaea backed by facts that can all be traced to the source
 * How can the article be improved?
 * maybe add a lead
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * looking at the range of topics it covers as well as pointing out any topics that it might fail to cover

Overall evaluation
excellent

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: opt out of this assignment