User:Cy.Doyle/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Marilyn Fernberger

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because at first because of the banner at the top warning viewers about the various issues within this topic. This article is also categorized as an "orphan", being linked to no other articles.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: Although this lead section does have an inclusive introductory scented, it is missing information when it comes to a brief description of the articles major sections. This overall lead section is not very detailed and slightly limited.

Content: All of this content is up to date and relevant. All of this information does belong but I'm not sure if there is information missing. This does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance: One of the reasons this article is flagged because some of the wording promotes this subject in a subjective matter. Although the information is being presented this way, it doesn't impair the real information. The viewpoints are described in a good manner and the article isn't trying to persuade the viewer in a certain way.

Sources and References: Most information has a reliable secondary source to back it up. The sources are thorough for the limited information that was provided. The sources are slightly current, they all were retrieved in the past year. There is room for better sources because some of them are news coverages. All links do work and the sources are slightly diverse in who has written them.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is well-written and doesn't have any grammatical or spelling errors. The article is in need of more specific categories.

Images and Media: This article doesn't include and images.

Talk Page Discussion: There are no discussions on this talk page. This article is rated as a start class and is part of WikiProject Women.

Overall Impression: The overall status of this article is incomplete and missing information. A strength of this article is providing dates with its information. This article could be improved by taking out the subjectivity and adding more specific categories to provide more information. This article is overall underdeveloped.