User:CyanCaribou/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Feminist sexology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because in one of the other modules I learnt about choosing an article, based on if it was in the start or stub phase, this way I can have critiques to the page.

Evaluate the article
Lead section


 * could use a brief overview of the topics to be covered in the article.
 * run on sentences that are not concise and use words such as "shares many principles", and "break down the problematic ideas that have been expressed by sexology in the past". Maybe these could be elaborated on in different sections such as historic section, and the 'many principles' could be more specific.

Content


 * seems relatively up to date.
 * non-neutral tone, biased.
 * not many in-text citations, could use more references.

Tone and Balance


 * Could use a more neutral tone.
 * seems incomplete

Talk-page discussions


 * reminded me of the importance of neutrality
 * reminded me of looking for lack of citations.

Organization and writing quality


 * mediocre, some run on sentences could be fixed to make the article more concise.

Sources and Literature


 * needs more sources
 * heavily relies on a few sources, making it seem like opinions of professors etc, is a consensus among historians / community.

Images and media


 * needs images and media with descriptive captions that add to the article.

Overall Impressions


 * incomplete
 * biased and not neutral
 * relies heavily on few sources
 * lead section is unclear and run-on sentences distract reader from the actual main points.
 * section divisions are a little weird.