User:Cyn4 sfu/Spatsizi Plateau Wilderness Provincial Park/Alejandrogzzz Peer Review

Review done by Alejandro Garces
Reading the article on Spatsizi Plateau Wilderness Provincial Park I find that the lead is concise but could benefit from reorganization for clarity. The subheading of ecology feels long and could improve the readability. The added content is relevant, up-to-date, and addresses the ecological and cultural aspects of the park, making it more inclusive. The content also manages to convey the history and traditional significance of the parks, making it more inclusive and representative of the Indigenous communities in the area, while maintaining a critical stance.

The tone is neutral and unbiased, with no apparent bias, it shows there is no intentions to persuade the reader. The content is supported by reliable sources, from different webpages, governmental websites, and variety of database. However, for the History section, the first paragraph loses relevance as it goes back into very early history, and does not relate to later information, maybe contrasting it with traditional knowledge of the land or Native Communities could help the reader to find interest and engagement in this section. Additionally, under the "First Nation - Cultural Heritage" sub heading, in the last small paragraph, it says "various legend, archaeological, non-Aboriginal fur trade sites have been conserved." I think this information can be interesting and educative, plus it helps to add context about Indigenous People in the zone, maybe there is already an Wikipedia article about the legend or the archeological site that you can link to.

No images were added, this could be an opportunity to improve, and help the reader to visualize the parks and its sub-divisions.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)