User:Cyndhr/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the meat industry in the United States
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic and is neutrally written. It demonstrates the impact COVID-19 on the meat industry. Each claim has a citation but it seemed like not all citations are reliable. Another Wikipedian has contributed to edit the article but some of the requests have been declined.
 * Sources
 * https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/news/columns/spotlight-on-economics/spotlight-on-economics-covid-19-impact-on-meat-consumers-and-producers
 * https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/90335
 * https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/90335

Option 2

 * Social Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is not very relevant to the topic. The topic seems to be very broad and the major sections do not relate much. Many of the claims do not have a citation and not all citations are reliable. There doesn't seem to be any other Wikipedians contributing in the talk page.
 * The article's content is not very relevant to the topic. The topic seems to be very broad and the major sections do not relate much. Many of the claims do not have a citation and not all citations are reliable. There doesn't seem to be any other Wikipedians contributing in the talk page.


 * Sources
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385373/

Option 3

 * Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic and is written neutrally. Many of the claims do have a citation and the citations are reliable. There doesn't seem to be other Wikipedians that are talking about this article through the talk page.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic and is written neutrally. Many of the claims do have a citation and the citations are reliable. There doesn't seem to be other Wikipedians that are talking about this article through the talk page.


 * Sources
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402120303246

Option 4

 * George Floyd Protests
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. The article seemed to be neutrally written with many reliable sources. The claims do have a citation and the article went into deep detail about the topic. On the talk page it seems like Wikipedians are explaining what some of the content means.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. The article seemed to be neutrally written with many reliable sources. The claims do have a citation and the article went into deep detail about the topic. On the talk page it seems like Wikipedians are explaining what some of the content means.


 * Sources
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0081246320947856

Option 5

 * Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Politics
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content matches the topic. It is not neutrally written because it has perspectives from many other countries. The claims have a citation, however, not all the citations are reliable. On the talk page, some Wikipedians are talking about creating a new article since there is a lot of information already being added to the current article.
 * The article's content matches the topic. It is not neutrally written because it has perspectives from many other countries. The claims have a citation, however, not all the citations are reliable. On the talk page, some Wikipedians are talking about creating a new article since there is a lot of information already being added to the current article.


 * Sources
 * https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3573224