User:Cynthiateng12/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Kuih
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I choose this topic is because I'm born and raised in Malaysia. Kuih is also my favorite food.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Some part of the article are overly detail.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?

Yes


 * Is the content up-to-date?

There are more information to add on into this articles. It can be more organised.


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

There are some content need more evaluation, especially those Kuih that are not link to other page of Wikipedia.


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Yes

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?

Yes


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No


 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes. It need more citation to support this article.


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

No


 * Are the sources current?

There are some source are no long exist online. It need to update.


 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

I think there are written by a diverse spectrum of authors because Malaysia and Singapore are multicultural country. They do not contain any historical context because this article is mainly talking about foods.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Some link work does not work.The sources and links need to update.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

It is not easy to read because it is too messy. It is hard to find any Kuih that I want.


 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?

Yes


 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

I think it needs to be more organised. For example, we can classify into Nyonya Kuih, Malay Kuih, Chinese Kuih, Indian Kuih.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

Yes. It does.


 * Are images well-captioned?

Yes


 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

No


 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

No. Some image laid out can cause confusion.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

The conversation is about adjusting the name of the topic and the content of the article.


 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

It is part of the WikiProject.


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?

I like the description of what Kuih really is. It describes concisely and contain enough detail for reader to understand.


 * How can the article be improved?

Wikipedians need to check the grammar of the article, ensure the page is well-organised and update the source and the link.


 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: