User:Cyrancher23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Veterans studies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am a veteran myself and of all the topics this one sounded the most interesting to me today.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section does a great job describing what Veterans studies is and what it's goals are. There is not a lot of content about Veterans Studies, the content primarily consists of some of the academic programs in the US that are offering courses in Veterans Studies. While I think this is written in an unbiased tone, I could see someone who does not like veterans viewing this topic as biased. The line " Offered online and on campus, the interdisciplinary certificate "program trains students to listen to, learn from, serve, research, and advocate for veterans and their families." could be viewed as pro veteran and there are people out there who do not like veterans. There are plenty of sources for this page, primarily about the academic programs. The article is well written and is concise and to the point. There are no images on this page. The Talk page does not currently have any conversations going on it.

Overall, this page offers a good quick explanation of Veterans Studies, but does not go into detail about what exactly Veteran Studies is and exactly how it can benefit society. The page could also go into better detail about what exactly it takes to get these degree minors and certificates in Veterans Studies.