User:Cyril Salame/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * No, this lead do not include and introductory sentence.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No it doesn't.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * In fact, the lead is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes we can consider that it's relevant.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * The newest reference was from 2014, yet the article can be considered somehow up-to-date even tho the article can be renewed
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Yes there could be more relevant informations.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Not really
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Underrepresented
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * The article states facts and has a neutral tone

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes there are many references
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The sources do work, and the links are valid

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes the article is concise and very clear I found the reading easy and smooth
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes the articles is perfectly organized

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * , i found that there were a lack of images and vivacity
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * In fact, there are some conversations about the topic, and people found the article well organized and structured.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Yes it's a part of Wikiproject and is rated correctly based on the information it contains
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? The article is informative,neutral and provides us information about the environmental situation in Lebanon
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * simplicity and clearness as well as straightforwardness
 * How can the article be improved?
 * The article should include additional relevant and interesting information about the topic, as well as images.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * The article is well structured but incomplete.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: