User:Czesz003/Meromictic lake/Backhand03 Peer Review

General info
Czesz003
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Czesz003/Meromictic lake
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Meromictic lake

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
There is no lead information added so far.

Content
The content written is precise and relevant to the topic of the article. The author succinctly present information about the formation of meromictic lakes both naturally and from human actions (like salt use for deicing). The information provided is not unsubstantiated as sources are provided, the author also makes good use of links to other Wikipedia articles which can explain topics when needed. However, there are some areas that could be better cited/supported with references (see sources section).

While I think the author has good information down, more could be added if they choose to do so. For example, are there other human activities that lead to meromictic lake formation? What areas of the world is this common in (since road salt is not used everywhere).

Tone and Balance
The tone and balance of the article is appropriate. The author very clearly seeks to educate and not convince readers of a certain view point. Information presented does not frame human impact in any one way and instead is impartial while presenting facts.

Organization
Overall, organization is done well in the draft. Sentence structure and the overall flow of information is logical and easy to follow; the author first explains how these lakes form naturally before discussing how they form from human activity.

Images and Media
These are not used in this draft.

Overall Impressions
My overall impression that the author has done some strong work but that certain areas could be improved. Citations need to be added for the second part of the draft (see source section). The information included in the draft could also be expanded upon in many areas if the author chooses to do so (see content section). Overall, the sources that are included support the information, which is presented succinctly in an unbiased, and logical way.