User:D!am0nddd/Nickelodeon Universe/Seakob3 Peer Review

The lead does a very good job at establishing what you need to know before reading. It doesn't include an unnecessary information nor is it too wordy and over-detailed. It would seem all of the content you uploaded is accurate and new, relevant information. The one thing I am hung up on is the retail and food aspect. You say that it is an amusement park and has rides, so why is there a detailed list of the retail stores and food places in it? I just feel like that is completely irrelevant information. The images do a great job of depicting exactly what the place is. The idea of an indoor amusement park seems pretty complex, so I am glad the images show how it is possible. Another thing I really like is the charts and how they are organized. Overall it is very well put together and informative. It feels more complete and ready to be put on the internet.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)