User:D. Vase/Chronic condition/Aamna11 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? D.Vase
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:D. Vase/sandbox

Content
Your content is important but can be edited more to flow smoothly between points. I'm not sure how useful the extra text boxes are, since I can't tell their purpose in the section that you're writing -- they also would benefit from citations.

Sources and References
The sources seem relevant and trustworthy. You can consolidate your sources (6-8) by reusing the first citation (6) instead of having to cite the same thing three times.

Organization
The content can benefit from extra organization within the subsection, and can improve with extra attention to sentence structure and extra scrutiny in terms of logical transitions between your sentences.

Overall impressions
Overall, I think it's really important for nursing to be acknowledged as a profession related to chronic conditions, so I think you should have two extra sections under nursing that talk about the background framework that is part of the movement towards more nursing involvement in chronic condition care and another that talks about the research that is happening that supports that information. I do think your additions will improve the existing article greatly -- they are very specific and draw attention to an important matter!