User:D. Vase/Nursing/Subaitar34 Peer Review

General info
Here I'll be reviewing Guz's (D. Vase) work on Nursing.

Lead
The lead has a good, solid introduction to nursing as a profession and the different aspects of it. It doesn't touch upon the worldwide aspect, though, which is where the added section is.

Content
There was no Latin American section before Guz's edits, so I'd say the content added is extremely relevant for kick-starting that section. While it does have a solid amount on nursing education, it would be interesting to see if other sectors like the history and current state of nursing can be added. At the moment, though, this is a very good start to establishing a substantial section on Latin America.

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral - no biases or unevenly represented viewpoints. The additions were based strictly on fact.

Sources and References
Both the new added sentences are cited, but the first link doesn't work. It might just be a matter of forgetting to include the link. The second one does redirect and seems to be a strong source to use.

Organization
The content added is well-written and clear. It's concise with no obvious grammatical or spelling errors. The second sentence is a little winding but it still reads fine, so it's just a stylistic preference on my part.

Overall impressions
The edits to Nursing so far are good and show great promise to build on in the future. It provides a lot of quality and substance to the article that wasn't there before. All that is needed is the fixation on sourcing from what I can see. I'm not sure how far your research expands on this in general but I think it shows a lot of potential. It's a great addition to the article.