User:DGG/testas2021

1. press release for a foundation press agent. Claimed child prodigy. The sources include the Daily Mirror and a quote possibly out of context about a fictional character in the only actual reliable source, the   human interest story  in the Daily  Telegraph, ref 1 (ref 6 is a different paper)

not notable as a novelist--the books arent even in WorldCat and are apparently self published, if we can trust amazon--there's nothing better. When an article on an author omits stating the publisher, I've learned to always check for self-publication. .

2/
 * The above statement was written by " a Communications Specialist at the Wikimedia Foundation." which is an alternative term for someone who write Public Relations. I'm sure they mean well for WP, but it shows the usual total misunderstand of people employed by the foundation of the purpose of Wikipedia, and the almost total inability of anyone whose background is in PR to understand how to write NPOV WP articles. I don't want to denigrate PR--it serves a useful purpose in the world. I don't even want to say the Foundation shouldn't engage in it for the purposes of spreading awareness and  interest in our projects. But these purposes are the very opposite of NPOV.