User:DJWellaaa/Hydnum/Patvil24 Peer Review

General info

 * Lead
 * Yes. I believe the author is adjusting the article for clarity and balance. It has been updated by the author, and I believe that it's a work in progress.
 * Content
 * It appears the majority of the content displayed by the author are corrections. Examples being where the author explained that some of the information was incorrectly cited, and also adjustments to sentence structures. I look forward to updated content, and learning more about Hydnum, as it appears that the author has additional content to add in the future.
 * Tone and Balance
 * The goal of the author appears to be the delivering of tone and balance to the existing article. I look forward to updates.
 * Sources and References
 * My only critique is that I believe there should be at least 10 sources according to the Professor, but I believe it's clear that this subject is light on educational material. I believe that in this case an exemption to that rule could be requested due to the circumstances, but this is only my opinion.
 * Organization
 * I believe the adjustments were well written, but It appears that this is a work in progress so I estimate that additional details will be given by the author going forward in the course.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Organization
 * I believe the adjustments were well written, but It appears that this is a work in progress so I estimate that additional details will be given by the author going forward in the course.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

DJWellaaa


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:DJWellaaa/Hydnum
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJWellaaa/Hydnum?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJWellaaa/Hydnum?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)