User:DKParker/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Sacrament (LDS Church)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: It's horribly misleading in places and criminally under-referenced at a *glance*, much less in content.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? More or less.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It has detail in places it is not needed and glosses over the actual event.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? More or less.
 * Is the content up-to-date? More or less.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Far more of the latter than of the former.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? It is mostly neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There are strange diversions, but it isn't especially unbalanced.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Yes, several positions that are not noteworthy are represented without being cited.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? As much as can be done.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? More or less.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not after a minor punctuation edit.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? More or less.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, but none are needed.
 * Are images well-captioned? None are there.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Very few, mostly fighting over names.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? LDS project overall.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? N/A

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? It needs dramatic improvement.
 * What are the article's strengths? Phrasing.
 * How can the article be improved? Pointless diversions and criminal under-referencing.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: