User:DLD1991/Ottoman invasion of Persia (1906)/Kangaroo503 Peer Review

General info
DLD1991
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:DLD1991/Ottoman invasion of Persia (1906)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ottoman invasion of Persia (1906)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I thought that the article was well written. I think the language is engaging yet informative. From the beginning of the article it is clear what the topic is and what the reader can expect. The information is presented in chronological order which is appropriate for the content. Links were included appropriately throughout the article. There were still things that might benefit from having background such as more of the locations mentioned. Even further explanation of the reasoning behind some of the actions could benefit the article. The tone of the article is neutral and seems appropriate for Wikipedia. Overall, the article was well written and is evident that the proper amount of time and effort was put forth.