User:DMinorsGoodluck/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the article, "Biomagnetism."

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I was scrolling through Low Class Stub articles in the Biology WikiProject and Biomagnetism caught my eye as we were discussing it in Advanced Cell Biology last week. It's a rather interesting topic about how some organisms can consume magnetic metals like Fe and use the magnetic fields they produce to essentially geo-navigate along earth's magnetic field.Though it looks like that kind of explanation is more in the likes of magnetoreception.

Evaluate the article
The article starts off with a stellar opening sentence that explains exactly what biomagnetism is; the magnetic fields produced by living organisms. Though it is brief, the article is very to the point and provides easy to digest information however despite that, the article is so short and brief that it feels like an article on biomagnetism and more of an article about people who significantly contributed to the study. As a whole, it feels like it should belong on another article as a brief section on important figures on the study. Though this may be due to the fact that the field is relatively new and niche, the article reads literally like a link to other more interesting topics like magnetoreception or the like. There's no particular bias towards anything as the article isn't long enough to show signs of that bias and it doesn't have any pictures whatsoever to increase the impact and understanding of the topic. Overall, the article is brief, professional but lacking substance. It doesn't feel complete, it feels like a footnote on another page.