User:DOGEVOL2/Anarchism in China/Qmao12 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) ：DOGEVOL
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:DOGEVOL/Anarchism in China

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Although it is listed in the directory, the contents have not been written yet
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead part has not been written, but the content has been written a lot, this part will not be evaluated.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
It fits the theme and is up to date. I think it's a bit of a minority theme.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
It's natural on the whole. But in this paragraph 'A contemporary view of anarchism in early China', the last sentence is a question, which I don't think the tone is appropriate.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No, but some of them is.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Some of them are not listed yet and are not evaluated. The ones listed are relevant to the topic.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
I think it's very good, especially in the first paragraph of the article, 'A contemporary view of anarchism in early Chinawhich' describes the anarchism in China in two different periods, which is quite clear.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
It's not evaluated until it's done.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
This topic tends to touch on political issues. So be careful how you present your ideas, and see how neutral the tone and position are when you're done.