User:DOI bot/Sandbox

This is a page full of references for the DOI bot to try and fix. Please add problem citations to the top of the page, with a brief note of the error if necessary.

New examples
Please add new examples here

Incorrect DOI added
The DOI bot added the for this citation (which lacked it), but that DOI is incorrect: it points to a different paper.



Eubulides (talk) 15:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Regression test examples

 * These are examples that did not work as expected in previous versions. They are here for the purpose of regression testing, to help verify that new versions work at least as well as the old versions did, and do not re-introduce any old bugs by accident.

Wrong }} braces removed.

This citation uses the tag id = :

Adding too much whitespace.

Another reference the bot does not find. Google scholar finds it easily:

Result should be 10.1007/s11837-003-0202-z.

Here is a reference with a DOI that is easy to find. However, the page numbers are a range. This should be preserved.

Here is one that should be easy to find, but the bot misses, perhaps because the journal name includes a wiki link. Also, the 'dash' separator is an em-dash or en-dash, this should be preserved. (It shows up oddly in the script output; don't know if it works when writing back.)

Correct answer should be DOI: 10.1086/320638.

Here is a reference without a DOI that is hard to find, perhaps because the publisher is a wiki link.

Here is a reference with a URL and a DOI already.

Here is a reference with a DOI that contains weird characters. However the bot does not find it.

DOIs STILL ADDED MULTIPLE TIMES

DOES NOT FIND THE REFERENCE.

Here is a reference from 'Science'.