User:DTM2020UPRC/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Table tennis
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. Because i like the sport.

Lead

 * Guiding questions

The article includes an introductionary sentence very accurate and overly detailed explaining the topic and the game rules and how is it played. It includes a description of all of the aspects of the game. All ofd the information on the lead is mentioned in the articule.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

At of the article's information is relevant for the reader's understanding of the topic. The articule is continuesly being modified incluiding new techniques, rules of the game,famous people from the sport, achievements, etc. All of the content in the articule gives various information about the game and does not show lack of information.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

During all the article the authors has a neutral tone regards the topic. The articule has no inclinations to any viewpoints whatsoever, it does not intend to persuade the reader, it just informates the reader about what the game of table tennis consists.


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

Most of the sources in the article are updated this year, most of the information has second reliable sources. The problem of the articule is that besides it has plenty information, it lacks of references and citations. The links in the reference all lead to an existing cite and are current. The source of this articule is written by more than one author.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

Although the article is overly packed with relevant information about the topic,it is very easy to read and has coherence. The article order of telling the information is well organized in chronological order of importance.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

The article offers the reader in every part of the topic images to understand better what they are explaining like a kind if backup. The images are very readable, well-captioned and ahere's to the wikipedia's copyright regulations.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

The only conversation is about two guys posting grammar changes, one from last year an annother from this year. This article is rated with a C because it needs more citations and references.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

Thestatus of the article overall is fine, i understanded it quite well, its strengths are all the information that gives about the types of techniques and strategies that can be used in the game and the background history. The article can be imprved if all of the information in it had come from reliab;le sources.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: