User:DThatcher99/Writing across the curriculum/Sugaryshae Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Article I'm Reviewing: DTHATCHER99

The lead encapsulates the topic well, I think it may be beneficial to briefly mention the sub-sections that will be mentioned later on in the text, for instance, you could mention that the article will be discussing several theories related to writing across the cirriculum and the potential drawbacks that will be addressed.I also think including more citations in the lead section would be helpful for understanding where the information is coming from.

The content added is relevant to your topic, it may possibly be helpful to reorganize some of your subsections, for example, placing WAC in First-Year Composition before WAC in Upper-Division Courses. In your section on possible drawbacks of WID you mention "Most literature professionals specialize only in English or literature", is there a source that evidences this claim?

Your section on WID in the US is longer than WID Across the Globe, are there any sources you could consult to add additional information to this section? It may be beneficial to lengthen the section about Across the Globe so as not to be biased towards representing the U.S..

I'm wondering if there's a few more current sources (2021-2023) you could consult to show how writing across the curriculum is talked about more recently.

I noticed Mike Palmist works up several times in your works cited section; have any scholars written responses to his work that may contradict what he's saying?

In your section on possible drawbacks it may be helpful to link a definition to the word "moot" to clarify it's definition for those who have not encountered the word.

WID in the U.S. and History of WAC isn't heavily cited, I was wondering where this information is coming from.

You've covered many important ideas related to your topic, your wording is clear and you do a nice job of explaining each section using relevant sources!