User:Da Real sar/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Manufactured housing:The article is well written and has relevant content to the topic, such as how they are built and the United States standards to be considered a mobile home. As well as the different variations of manufactured housing that are currently being offered. The general tone of the article is written neutrally. Although, many of the claims do not have citations. For example, the construction process section shares how the homes are built but does not have a source to back up there claims.
 * Sources
 * - https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:5(708)
 * -https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/470/
 * -https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jrlaff13&div=40&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals

Option 2

 * Transitional housing:The article has information that is relevant to the topic, but could benefit from more content. Such as history in the USA. The article is written neutrally. There are two claims that need citations, but the citations it does have come from creditable sources. The article could also benefit from a section that discussion those who are impacted by transitional housing. :
 * Sources
 * -https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ageing-and-society/article/shelterhousing-opt&#x5B;%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%C2%A6&#x5D;e-experiencing-homelessness/3BFE8C02EB5803C266ABFDCB8606528C
 * -Progression through emergency and temporary shelter, transitional housing and permanent housing: A longitudinal case study from the 2018 Lombok …
 * -https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(21)00234-6/fulltext:

Option 3

 * Supportive housing:The article touches on relevant aspects of supportive housing, although some sections are more general housing and governmental policies focused. Therefore, certain parts could be condensed or taken out. The article is written in a persuasive way, biased towards highlighting the benefits of supportive housing. However, it does not adaquatly present other points of view, such as the downsides. The article includes citations to support the majority of its claims. Feedback on the talk page suggests that it is too lengthy and needs cleanup. Additionally, some users think it would be best to create a separate article focusing specifically on supportive housing in the USA.
 * Sources:-https://www.cbpp.org/research/supportive-housing-helps-vulnerable-people-live-and-thrive-in-the-community :-https://endhomelessness.org/ending-homelessness/solutions/permanent-supportive-housing/ :-https://www.hudexchange.info/homelessness-assistance/coc-esg-virtual-binders/coc-program-components/permanent-housing/permanent-supportive-housing/

Option 4

 * Section 8 (housing):The lead section could be improved by reorganizing the introduction. And bringing the most important information first. There are many facts presented that need citation. With some possibly outdated information, as it cites a fact for how long the waitlist being from 2010. While the majority of the article is written in a neutral tone, there are certain sections that could be reworded with less bias/negative connotation. Such as "not wanting the government involved in their business" in the summary section. In my opinion it sounds a little unprofessional. Overall the article would need to be fact checked and backed up with more creditable sources. :
 * Sources
 * U.S. Department of Housing and urban development
 * - https://www.hud.gov/topics/housing_choice_voucher_program_section_8
 * -https://www.hud.gov/press/press_releases_media_advisories/hud_no_23_076
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10511482.2021.2010118 - potential fact check for discrimination section in summary
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10511482.2021.2010118 - potential fact check for discrimination section in summary

Option 5
There are not many academic sources that discuss Corporate housing. Overall, making me question if the topic has enough "notability" to have its own page.
 * Corporate housing:There are a couple places that could be improved for clarity. such as " corporate housing revenue was $10 billion in 2019 and $2.47 in 2010." I am assuming that they mean 2.47 billion, but it should be written so there are no need for assumptions. And it does sound like it was written to persaude the reader. For example, "Corporate housing provides complete temporary housing solutions within a stable residential setting unlike extended stay hotels, which are surrounded by an open parking lot and are filled entirely by transient guests." The article is a good overview of corporate housing, but only has two citations. ::Sources :http://repository.smuc.edu.et/handle/123456789/6114