User:Da Real sar/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Cognitive hearing science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because the process of hearing is very interesting to me. And how science has advanced to help people who have trouble hearing.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Here's the corrected version:

Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic as it discusses subjects that are intertwined with cognitive hearing and the study of it. The article serves as an overview of cognitive hearing science, providing a good starting point for further readers' research to explore the science more. It is neutral and informative. As the article does not go into much depth about the science but rather references other disciplines that involve science, the page does not have many sources, only providing two. There is not a lot of conversation going on in the talk page compared to other topics that we have covered in class, which have a lot of conversations around them. This is a general tip of the iceberg topic that helps develop into more specialized areas.