User:Daalexandram/The Devil Wears Prada (film)/CharlieFarrell74 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * 2) Your article very properly depicts a number of problematic examples of women's beauty standards throughout the film The Devil Wears Prada. I think you do a great job of citing specific examples within the film, and using scholarly articles and sources in order to back your claims. I think that your writing throughout the piece is coherent and clear, and I think your piece reads well and is divided up nicely. I also think that there is a nice balance of examples within the article, and nothing is covered in far more detail than anything else.
 * 3) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 4) I would recommend you make a couple of changes. First of all, make sure everything that would require a citation has one. There are a couple times when you reference articles and I am not sure where the citations are - just make sure those are completed by the time you actually publish what is in your sandbox. I would also recommend that you make sure to maintain a neutral, informative tone at all times - you don't want to give an opinionated point of view off to the reader.
 * 5) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 6) The most important thing I would suggest doing is making absolutely sure that this article is written in a purely informative, non-argumentative manner. You cannot put an article out that is trying to convince people of something. This topic is a difficult one to write about objectively, because you are talking about direct reactions and opinions to the movie. I would just say to make sure that you let the opinions of others be the only detectable opinions within the article, or else things could be misconstrued.
 * 7) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?
 * 8) Yes. I definitely will be using the spacing and balancing of this article within our article. Our article is too beefy and daunting to read, and I think that dividing it up into more paragraphs and sections will give it far more readability and accessibility for the average Wikipedia user.

CharlieFarrell74 (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)