User:DabideJun.Jr

About me
I'm a Korean student at a community college in the U.S. I like science fiction and fantasy movies, and when I have time, I watch them in theaters or on Netflix. I like to listen to music I like, but I don't like to play an instrument. My favorite music is EDM(Electronic dance music) and Chill-out music.

My Wikipedia interests
I'm hoping to write one day if Wikipedia doesn't mention someone I admire. And I would like to correct any information that is wrong if it is already on Wikipedia. Because sometime people wrote wrong information in Wikipedia.

Article Evaluation
Having been born and raised in Japan, I sometimes believe that sexism exists in Japan, so I decided to look up sexism on Wikipedia. I visited the Gender inequality in Japan article on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: ”Is each fact cited with an appropriate, reliable source?", "Is anything left out of the article that should be there?", and "Is the article itself neutral? Are there heavily biased claims or language?".

At the first, aspect of "Is each fact cited with an appropriate, reliable source?". Especially, the content of ”Gender roles through traditions and modern society” does not provide any quotations or sources, making the content unreliable in all sentences. Being from Japan, I know this culture, so I can trust it, but people can't trust this content at all without a citation or source. Therefore, even if each sentence is true, it is unreliable because there are no quotations or sources.

the second, aspect of  "Is anything left out of the article that should be there?". ” Women with a career at the expense of focusing on a family have become a target for blame regarding Japan's unusually low birthrate.” this sentence doesn't have enough explanation. A major problem with Japan's abnormally high fertility rate is that it fails to address the fact that women can only choose between family and career, and that there is also a problem with the male-dominated social structure. For example, if a woman chooses both of a career and a family, the man may not support the woman. I think this part has to add about women not being able to choose both a career and a family and how men don't support women because of a male-dominated society.

the third, "Is the article itself neutral? Are there heavily biased claims or language?". This article itself had a lot of calmly neutral content with no particularly large discriminatory content, but it did say that even though men and women are equal in law, women are still not able to gain an equal footing with men due to Japan's male-dominated social structure. For example, there are a lot of things that I've learned from my experience: gender roles due to tradition, and how jobs in big companies force you to do almost everything on a work-first basis until people retire.

thus, There are some parts of this article that are not credible as no quotes or sources have been cited for this. There is also a lack of explanation in the article. However, there is still a lot of sexism in Japan. And even though, legally, men and women are equal, there is still a male-dominated social structure in place.