User:Daeshjeam/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Climate and Clean Air Coalition to Reduce Short-Lived Climate Pollutants

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this article to evaluate because it is related to what we have talked about in class. We have talked the cause of climate change which is green house gases and what laws and regulations that are set in place to basically help clean the air.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

During my evaluation of the article Climate and Clean Air Coalition to reduce Short- Lived Climate Pollutants the lead of the paper did consider and clearly described the article's topic by explaining what CCAC is and who it was launched by. The article does not include a brief description of the article's major sections. The article just states what countries pledged how much money and where the program was managed out of. The lead is somewhat concise and could have been better by actually giving a brief description of the articles major sections. The content of the article is relevant to the topic throughout the reading. The content of the countries is fairly outdated because the Partners date back to March 2014 and it’s 2022. The question is are the partners still partner countries to this day. I believe in the article where it states the non-state partners. I don't think that belongs in the article because it can be clearly identified what Countries are not on the list when the Countries partners are listed. Also Non- State partners do not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines and have been removed. The article is neutral in a way but also it has a fringe viewpoint focusing just on the topic of Short- Lived Climate Pollutants. While clicking on some of the links they were not reliable on the words that they were associated with such as the “reducing black carbon emissions from heavy duty vehicles and engines. The link took me to a website that had nothing about that on the website. The sources aren’t current; they mostly are dating back to 2009 -2014. They do not include historically marginalized individuals. The links did work but they all weren’t correct to the topic. It is an easy to read article, pretty simple, not too much. The links basically sent you to the same website to get more information but their website had updated and not straight forward to the point. Yes, it is broken down in sections to reflect the major points. The article did not include any images for enhanced  understanding of the topic. I personally did not see anything on the talk page of this article; nobody was talking behind the scenes. The article is a class C. Wikipedia discusses the article more complex than we talked about in class. The overall status of the article was okay and could have been up to date to what’s going on right now. Also on what is in place now to improve the Climate Change and Air from Pollutants.