User:Daeshjeam/Flame retardant/Theheathbar01 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Daeshjeam


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daeshjeam/Flame_retardant?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Flame retardant

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. There were no distractions or off-topic comments that made the article confusing.

Article reads very neutrally, no bias towards anything. Very informative and professional-reading.

Doesn't seem to over- or under-represent any viewpoints; covers mechanisms, materials, safety, and environmental/health issues associated with flame retardants equally. Answers questions that came up as I read through the article.

There are a couple of dead links but they are for old sources and could probably be removed/replaced with new sources now.

All facts appear supported by reputable sources (science journals, studies, etc.) and have neutral viewpoints. No apparent biases.

Some old sources from early 2000s that should be replaced (dead links), nothing appears to be missing.