User:Daisylexi2244/Josefa Zaratt/Sbondurant Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Daisylexi2244


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Josefa Zaratt


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Josefa Zaratt

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I would say that the intro sentence is good, but there is nothing else in the lead to tell what the whole page is gonna be about. You forgot to mention what she does after medical school, her career, etc. The context of the lead doesn't come up again, maybe incorporate her place and date of birth in an "early life" section.

Article: The organization is pretty bare. Even though there is not much written in the article quite yet, there are still a lot of errors that could easily be fixed. There is good information, but it needs to be cleaned up a bit. There is a good balance and neutrality in the article, which is good.

References: You have good references and the links work. They are complete and easily accessible in the article.

Existing article: N/A (created article)

New article: There is the idea of comprehensiveness, but there are still a lot of gaps that need to be filled. There is only one section, so maybe add a few more! You could have an "early life", "education", and "career" section in your article!