User:Daisysandpeaches/Yixianopterus/MvKino Peer Review

General info
Daisysandpeaches
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Daisysandpeaches/Yixianopterus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Yixianopterus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

This article does a good job of introducing new discoveries to a page that was rather small and gave a general overview. This addition adds great depth and allows readers that are new to the subject get a better understanding of its history. Some changes that I think would really bring together this article is photos. It may be hard to gather direct photos of what is being referenced but maybe ones that show the close ancestors mentioned in the article. This would allow new readers who have no previous knowledge on the subject, grasp a better idea of what is being conveyed. Some people are visual learners. Besides adding photos I can see how adding to this page would be hard. Maybe adding more links to hard to understand vocabulary would improve it. You have a clear lead section with links that make it easier to understand, a clear structure with balanced and unbiased content and a reliable academic journal from north China where the study is taking place. Everything introduced to the article is relevant to the topic. Nothing is really over represented and the added content gives a good outline of how new studies on this topic could be added in the future. The citation link to the article works and in text citation was used. The article is also from within 5 years.