User:Daisyyvenegas/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose the Barbie film article on Wiki becaue I loved the movie and found the take on contemporary representation and feminism really interesting. I really liked the article becasue of all the sections it had and they way it was structured. I liked it provided bits of information on various spects but not to the point where it could overwhelm or bore a reader.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead: the article did include all the factos mentioned abov. I liked that it was consise and not too word becasue it got right to the point.

Content: Yes, this article does deal with one of the gaps. It takes a look into a feminsit movie. The goal of the movie was to empower and represent women and that was highlighted throughout the article. It is also up to date since the movie was recently released.

Tone and Content: I think this article was written in a neteral point of view. It was able to acknowledege that this movie is praised but did not share personal insight or opinion.

Sources and Refrences: the sources throughout are current and I really liked how they were able to incorporate multiple of sources all from diffrent authors and/or creators.

Organization and Writting Quality. This article is very easy to read. I really like the way it is structured because it makes it very reader friendly. The way it is organized also helps keep the reader's focus and entertained. I did not see any gramatical errors. Something that was added that I really liked was that they added a section where they wrote about other countries in which Barbie was censored for the views.

Images and Media. The article has the movie poster, photos of the actors, and pictures onf interviews on the page. I though this was good because they related to what was being talked about but I feel like a couple more pictures could have been added.

Talk page discussion: The talk page is very extenssive and has a myrad of comments. They deal with rewording certain sentences or adding additional information that is relevant. I could not tell if it was apart of any groups.

Overall Impression: I really liked this article and the way it was structured. I also liked that it included ideas and topics one would not necessarily think are relevant to the film.