User:Dalanlaughlin/Poverty in Kenya/Angelasliu0 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Dalanlaughlin
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Dalanlaughlin/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
'''The lead wasn't edited, but I do think (if there's time and you want to edit more sections) that it can definitely be improved. While, length-wise, it appears fine, a lot of the arguments made are not backed by sources and data and do not carry the most neutral tone possible.'''

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
'''Adding a gender inequality section is very useful and a dimension that the original Wikipedia article overlooked. I think this is a great section to add. If I had to critique a part of the added content, however, I think that it would be great if it was backed up my facts/statistics, especially when you say, for example, "a large majority of young women do not attend secondary school and very few go on to higher education". What exactly does a "large majority" mean, and "very few" mean? It would be more useful to go into depth into that claim, and this can be applied to the other claims you make, also.'''

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
'''I believe that you did well in keeping the tone neutral balanced. I think women/gender equality can be a touchy subject so just make sure that the tone is neutral/ unbiased.'''

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
'''There is only the second source listed in your sandbox right now. Make sure to add in/cite the first and third sources, also. Nevertheless, the second source is currently working, it is a recent source (within the last decade), and is one that reflects the available literature and is reliable.'''

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
'''The content is well-written, concise, clear, and easy to read. There are no evident grammatical or spelling errors, and the content is well-organized.'''

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
'''Overall, I think the section you're adding is great and useful. I also support the 2 paragraphs that you're deleting in the bottom of the section (in social inequality and poverty) because they seem to be full of useless info and not supported by sources. I would just focus on making the content you added, backing them up with statistics, and making sure that your sources are complete. Overall, good addition!'''