User:Dalastrascastrejon/Disease ecology/Mari2132 Peer Review

Whose work are you reviewing?
Dalastrascastrejon - Disease Ecology

Link to draft you're reviewing

 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dalastrascastrejon/Disease_ecology?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template:

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

 * Has not added to official article yet

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

General


 * 1) Great form of introduction, in terms of defining disease ecology and how it plays a part in the health of the environment
 * 2) Good leadings and terminology usage

Lead & Content


 * 1) Satisfied with knowing the importance of disease ecology, article does lead with explaining what it is and how it affects different parts of ecology and society as a whole. Because the lead is well explained, it gives weight to other parts of the article,  such as the how it effects climate change and how we can determine disease ecology.

Tone & Balance


 * 1) No tone of bias and all the views/points made were backed up and thoroughly explained

Sources


 * 1) Many wiki-links to new/uncommon words
 * 2) A section with all the references and the literature used was explained

Organization


 * 1) it follows the organization of the original article
 * 2) Define/explaining disease ecology → why its important and what it effects → and then how to predict disease ecology.

Images


 * 1) no media/images

Overall impressions


 * 1) Because the original article did not cover much, Daniela's additions do greatly improve the article.  Great explanations about disease ecology and its effects are great for the reader to understand the topic.  Overall great work.