User:Dalia Arafat5221/Color psychology/Apollo1997 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dalia Arafat5221


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dalia%20Arafat5221/Color_psychology?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Color psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the changes you have made to the lead section have been good. Most of the statements and facts made in the first section belong in a subsection of the article as the lead goes too much into detail rather than giving a brief overviews of what the article will contain. Other than that though, this article was a good read and is organized well. Each subsection is clearly labelled and with the exception of a few, are very descriptive. As for the information you have added, I like that you are choosing to add information to the history section which is underrepresented in this article. You have added one paragraph, but I think this article would benefit more from adding 2-3 more paragraphs of information on the history of color psychology. Having more history will give the article more meaning. There are some other areas in the article that would benefit from being edited as well. The sports performance section could use some work as there is only one source linked to the entire section. There are a lot of statements made in the section with no reference as to were the information was pulled from. almost every section is well represented in this article, but the Gaming section seems to be under represented. Gaming has exploded in popularity the past ten years so adding more information on color and gaming would be beneficial for the article.