User:Daltonanderson1002/Cliona celata/Amelia Twibell Peer Review

General info
Daltonanderson1002, Darciebailey1, Kbgsu25, Kyrabiggins, Jd29773
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Cliona celata sandbox draft:::Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The references section was really well done. The resources used are up to date and current thus supporting the draft's validity. Everything I read in the article was relevant to the article's topic and it was also presented in an unbiased manner and tone. This made it easier to understand the actual content being presented through the article and thus helped me actually learn something by reading the draft. The tone of this draft was balanced and well informed which caused me to find this a reliable article to read. The only aspect of this specific sandbox draft that could be improved is perhaps evaluating the "Lead" section of the article. The lead portion is typically a concise overview of the article's subject used to peak interest of the reader and create a smooth transition into the rest of the writing. Also, perhaps images might be added later. Images are a fun way to capture the interest of the reader but also a great way to display what the author's writing is describing. Overall, I thought this draft article was a great example of hard work and the subject matter was very interesting!