User:Daltonanderson1002/Cliona celata/Bf07145 Peer Review

General info
Daltonanderson1002
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Cliona celata
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cliona celata

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The lead has an introductory paragraph that describes the organism Cliona celata by introducing its common name as the "boring sponge".
 * I feel like the common name should have been capitalized, but the article has proper punctuation and grammar.
 * They have very detailed sections describing the organism's morphology, habitat, ecology, etc.
 * The links used in the article does work.
 * The content added are relevant to the topics and even includes pictures of the organisms.
 * There are in text citations that goes with the statement in support of their fact.
 * The article is supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources.
 * The images are well captioned in that they describe what is going on in the pictures.
 * All sources given reflects the available literature that is about the topic.
 * Overall, the content added has improved the overall quality of the article in that it is very detailed with information that is beneficial into learning about the organism.